I have deleted the comment, but refuse to ignore its existence.
This is what your people do, antinatalists, this is what they think is okay.
Furthermore, if two children dying is an atrocity, all children dying is a greater one, which is precisely what some of your number want.
You are a hypocrite for complaining (in your previous posts) about antinatalists censoring blog comments, and then proceeding to censor comments yourself.
ReplyDeleteYou hypocritically claim that posting a video depicting a horrible event is not okay, but believe that causing such horrible events to occur by allowing procreation to continue is okay; although the latter is incomparably worse than posting a video thereof.
You approve of a far greater number of people dying horribly in the indefinite future, than efilists, which, at most, would only want the present generation to die.
You misrepresent the efilist position which does not call dying per se an antrocity, only dying which causes suffering to the dying person or those left behind, which efilism seeks to eliminate.
Also, by your actions you demonstrated that of all things you could to with your time you assign a higher preference or importance to arguing against antinatalists that against those who actually cause suffering.
First off, I deleted the comment to prevent someone from accidentally clicking on it. I did not ignore it's existence, and sweep it under the rug like antinatalists seem to like doing.
ReplyDeleteSecond off, I do not "approve" of people in the future dying horribly, just as antinatalists can "approve" of H. P. Lovecraft's views on life while decrying his fascism.
Also, let me break this to you gently.
You are not, in any way, shape, or form helping anyone via antinatalism.
Instead you are putting living people into a terrible hell by indoctrinating them into your self-flaggelating cult and making them constantly dwell on their own pain and hate their own inability to kill themselves.
Furthermore, due to deep inbred genetic structures, you are not going to convince anyone other than a tiny minority to avoid having children.
Surely, you ask, the poor non-children in non-existene sipping on non-milkshakes and watching non-movies are being saved? In which case I simply direct you to my previous posts.
Third it is YOU who are the hypocrite. You get angry at me for calling out one of your number on his cynical use of a tragedy to in lieu of actual argumentation, but prop up the antinatalist practice of rubbing salt in one's psychological wounds and spending time whining on blogs rather than going out and feeding the homeless, or working in an animal shelter, or working in relief efforts.
Furthermore, I have received nothing but contempt for calling out apologists for structures that kill, abuse and denigrate thousands of individuals for the color of their skin.
You don't actually know anything about me. You don't know who I am, what I do, or how I live. All you know is that I disagree with a fringe philosophical position on a blog with a few posts, and you take this as proof that I have apparently dedicated my life to doing nothing but attacking said fringe philosophical position.